When and How to Use Extant Literature in Classic Grounded Theory

Alvita Nathaniel

doi:10.29333/ajqr/12441

Alvita Nathaniel ¹ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp. 45-59

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441

OPEN ACCESS 1792 Views 1741 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Glaser and Strauss (1967) sprinkled suggestions about the use of the literature throughout their seminal work as did Glaser in subsequent years. They, however, did not lay out a clear and structured overview of how to use the literature. The aim of this paper is to weave together the recommendations from classic grounded theory originators and to describe how, why, and when to review the literature and which literature to review. The paper includes a section debunking the no literature myth followed by descriptions of the three phases of the classic grounded theory literature review—the introduction phase, the integration phase, and the disposition phase. The three phases work together to substantiate, confirm, and enhance an emerging grounded theory and situate it within the existing body of knowledge.

Keywords: literature review, extant literature, grounded theory, classic grounded theory.

References

Andrews, T. (2003). Making credible: A grounded theory of how nurses detect and report physiological deterioration in acutely ill patients. University of Manchester.
Andrews, T. (2006). The literature in grounded theory: A response to McCallin (2003). Grounded Theory Review, 5(2/3), 29-32. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2006/06/30/1421/
Annells, M. (1996). Grounded theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 397-393.
Boell, S., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2010). Literature reviews and the hermaneutic circle Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721450
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2016). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
Burks, M., Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). SAGE Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. SAGE Publications.
Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. S. (2018). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the interpretive turn. SAGE Publications.
Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. S. (Eds.). (2016). Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory. Routledge.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. SAGE Publications.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5 ed.). SAGE Publications.
de Groot, A. D. (1969). Methodology: foundations of inference and research in the behavioral sciences. Mouton.
Dey, I. (2007). Grounding categories. In K. Charmaz & A. Bryant (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 166-190). SAGE Publications.
Didier, A. (2019). Aufgenhobenheit: Patients' perspective of interprofessional collaboration within a multidisciplinary care team. Université de Lausanne. Lausanne.
Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
Ekstrom, H. (2006). Aspects of McCallin's paper "grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study. Grounded Theory Review, 5(2/3), 45-46. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2006/06/30/1407/
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussion. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2007a). All is data. Grounded Theory Review, 6(2), 1-22.
Glaser, B. G. (2007b). Doing formal grounded theory: A proposal. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2011). Generating formal theory. In V. B. Martin & A. Gynnild (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and works of Barney Glaser (pp. 257-276 ). BrownWalker.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. A. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 4(1-24).
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
Guthrie, W., & Lowe, A. (2011). Getting through the PhD process using GT: A supervisor-researcher perspective. In V. B. Martin & A. Gynnild (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method, and works of Barney Glaser (pp. 51-68). BrownWalker.
Hallberg, L. R. M. (2010). Some thoughts about the literature review in grounded theory studies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 5(3), Article 5387. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v5i3.5387
Holton, J. A., & Walsh, I. (2017). Classic grounded theory: Applications with qualitative and quantitative data. SAGE Publications.
Houser, N., & Kloesel, C. (Eds.). (1992). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press.
Kaplan, A. (2011/1998). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. Transaction Publishers. (Original work published in 1964)
Martin, V. B. (2006). The relationship between an emerging grounded theory and the existing literature: Four phases for consideration. Grounded Theory Review, 5(2/3), 47-50.
Martin, V. B., & Gynnild, A. (Eds.). (2012). Grounded theory: The philosoophy, method, and work of Barney Glaser. BrownWalker.
McCallin, A. (2006). Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study. Grounded Theory Review, 5(2-3), 11-27. (Reprinted from "Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study." 2003, Contemorary Nurse, 15(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.15.1-2.61
Nathaniel, A. K. (2006a). Moral reckoning in nursing. Western journal of nursing research, 28(4), 419-438.
Nathaniel, A. K. (2006b). Thoughts on the literature review and GT. Grounded Theory Review, 5(2/3), 35-41.
Peirce, C. S. (1901/1992). On the logic of drawing history from ancient documents, especially from testimonies. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2, pp. 75-114). Indiana University Press.
Rhoades, E. A. (2011). Literature reviews. The Volta Review, 111(3), 353-368.
Rodale, J. I. (1978). The synonym finder. Warner.
Simmons, O. E. (2022). Experiencing grounded theory: A comprehensive guide to learning, doing, mentoring, teaching, and applying grounded theory. BrownWalker.
Stern, P. N., & Covan, E. K. (2001). Early grounded theory: Its processes and products. In P. N. Stern & E. K. Covan (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 17-34). Springer.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Strübing, J. (2007). Research as pragmatic problem solving: The pragmatist roots of emprically-grounded theorizing. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 580-601). SAGE Publications.
Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-642.
Thornberg, R., & Dunne, C. (2020). Literature review in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 206-221). SAGE Publications.
Thulesius, H. (2006). New way of using literature in GT. Grounded Theory Review, 5(2/3), 43-44.
van de Wijngaert, L., Bouwman, H., & Contractor, N. (2014). A network approach toward literature review. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 48(2), 623-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9791-3

Citation

Nathaniel, A. (2022). When and How to Use Extant Literature in Classic Grounded Theory. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(3), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441

Nathaniel, A. (2022). When and How to Use Extant Literature in Classic Grounded Theory. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(3), pp. 45-59. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441

Nathaniel A. When and How to Use Extant Literature in Classic Grounded Theory. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(3), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441

Nathaniel, Alvita. "When and How to Use Extant Literature in Classic Grounded Theory". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2022 6 no. 3 (2022): 45-59. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441

Nathaniel, Alvita "When and How to Use Extant Literature in Classic Grounded Theory". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 3, 2022, pp. 45-59. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441

Nathaniel A. When and How to Use Extant Literature in Classic Grounded Theory. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(3):45-59. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441