Teachers Talking About CLIL Pedagogy: Transforming Teacher Practices Through Collaborative Autoethnography

John Adamson; Julia Christmas; Li-hsin Tu

doi:10.29333/ajqr/13112

John Adamson ¹ ^* , Julia Christmas ¹ ^* , Li-hsin Tu ¹

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 185-205

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13112

OPEN ACCESS 1415 Views 863 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

This collaborative autoethnographic (CAE) study has investigated how three tertiary-level teachers of an English language lecture preparation course in a Japanese university engaged with each other over a two-year period from 2020 to 2022 regarding their approaches to the adoption of a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach to syllabus design and teaching. With two new teachers based in a newly established department and the other teacher in a more established department, insights were gained through the unfolding online CAE and face-to-face discourse into their respective thoughts and motivations underpinning their pedagogical philosophies and interpretations of the CLIL approach to meet their departmental and students' requirements. Key findings revealed that teacher backgrounds and experience with CLIL, as well as institutional shifts in curriculum aims, have all directly and indirectly shaped current course design and pedagogy and revealed similarities and differences in interpretations of CLIL over time. Of significance is how the CAE itself emerged as a vital community-building forum for the teachers themselves and acted as a site for varying levels of transformation in their pedagogical practices.

Keywords: CAE, CLIL, transformation, pedagogy, tertiary.

References

Aberasturi-Apraiz, E., Correa Gorospe, J. M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2020, September). Researcher vulnerability in doing collaborative autoethnography: Moving to a post-qualitative stance. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(3), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.3.3397
Adams, T. E., & Manning, J. (2015). Autoethnography and Family Research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12116
Adamson, J. L. & Coulson, D. (2015). Translanguaging in English academic writing preparation. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning 10(1), 24-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2015.1084674
Adamson, J. L. & Fujimoto-Adamson, N. (2021). Translanguaging in EMI in the Japanese tertiary context: Pedagogical Challenges and Opportunities. In B. A. Paulsrud, Z. Tian & J. Toth (Eds.), English-Medium Instruction and Translanguaging. (pp. 15-28). Multilingual Matters.
Adamson, J. L., Coulson, D. & Fujimoto-Adamson, N. (2019). Supervisory practices in English-medium undergraduate and postgraduate Applied Linguistics thesis writing: Insights from Japan-based tutors. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 14-27. https://www3.caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/view/594
Anderson, T. D., & Fourie, I. (2015). Collaborative autoethnography as a way of seeing the experience of care giving as an information practice. Paper proceedings of the Information Behaviour Conference (ISIC, Vol. 20, No. 1), Leeds, England. http://InformationR.net/ir/20-1/isic2/isic33.html Bamond Lozano, V. M., & Strotmann, B. (2015). Internationalizing higher education: Language matters. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 847–857. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43893790
Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experience of language teachers. System, 36(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002
Bochner, A. P. (2013). Putting meanings into Motion. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography. (pp. 50–56). Routledge.
Bochner, A. P. & Ellis, C. S. (2006). Communication as autoethnography. In G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as perspectives on theory (pp. 110–122). SAGE Publications.
Bradford, A. (2016). Teaching content through the medium of English: Faculty perspectives. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), Focus on the learner. (pp. 433–438). JALT. https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/jalt2015-pcp_056.pdf
Breault, R. A. (2016). Emerging issues in duoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(6), 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1162866
Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A. and Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language

instruction. Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Brown, H. & Adamson, J. L. (2012). Localizing EAP in Light of the Rise of English-Medium Instruction at Japanese Universities. OnCue Journal, 6(3), 5-20. http://www.jaltcue.org/files/OnCUE/OCJ6.3/OCJ6.3_pp5-20_FA_Brown_Adamson.pdf
Brown, H., & Iyobe, B. (2014). The growth of English medium instruction in Japan. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.). JALT 2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 9–19). JALT. https://jalt-publications.org/files/pdf-article/jalt2013_002.pdf
Burgess, C. (2014). To globalise or not to globalise? ‘Inward-looking youth’ as scapegoats for Japan's failure to secure and cultivate ‘global human resources’. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(4), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.966805
Chang, H. (2013). Individual and collaborative autoethnography as method: A social scientist’s perspective. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 107–122). Routledge.
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K-A. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Left Coast Press Inc.
Cooper, R., & Lilyea, B. (2022). I’m interested in autoethnography, but how do I do it? The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5288
Costley, T., & Reilly, C. (2021). Methodological principles for researching multilingually: Reflections on linguistic ethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 1035–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3037
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning.
Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. (2014). Interpretive autoethnography. SAGE Publications.
Edsall, D., & Saito, Y. (2012). The motivational beneﬁts of content. OnCue Journal, 6, 66–94. https://jaltcue.org/files/OnCUE/OCJ6.2/OCJ6.2_pp66-94_Edsall%26Saito.pdf
Ellis, C., & Adams, T. E. (2014). The purposes, practices and principles of autoethnographic research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 254–276). Oxford University Press.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), 273–290. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108.
Esposito, J., & Smith, S. (2006). From reluctant teacher to empowered teacher-researcher: One educator’s journey toward action research. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 45–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478893
Hickey, A., & Austin, J. (2007). Pedagogies of self: Conscientising the personal to the social. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 3(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.3.1.21
Hilton, A., & Hilton, G. (2017). The impact of conducting practitioner research projects on teachers’ professional growth. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(8), 77–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n8.6
Holman Jones, S., Adams, T. E., & Ellis, C. (2013). Introduction: Coming to Know Autoethnography as More than Method. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography. (pp.17–47). Routledge.
Ikeda, M. (2012). CLIL no genri to shidouhou [Principles and methodologies of CLIL]. In S. Izumi, M. Ikeda & Y. Watanabe. (Eds.), CLIL: Content and language integrated learning: New challenges in foreign language education at Sophia University: Practices and applications (Vol. 2, pp. 1‒15). Sophia University Press.
Imoto, Y. (2013). Japan: Internationalisation in education and the problem of introspective youth. In P.-t. J. Hsieh (Ed.), Education in East Asia (pp. 127–152). Bloomsbury.
Keleş, U. (2022a). Autoethnography as a recent methodology in applied linguistics: A methodological review. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5131
Keleş, U. (2022b). Writing a “good” autoethnography in educational research: A modest proposal. The Qualitative Report, 27(9), 2026–2046. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5662
Kirkpatrick, A. (2014). English as a medium of instruction in East and Southeast Asian Universities. In N. Murray & A. Scarino (Eds.), Dynamic ecologies: A relational perspective on languages education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 15–30). Springer.
Lamsfuß-Schenk, S. (2002). Geschichte und Sprache: Ist der bilinguale Geschichtsunterricht der Königsweg zum Geschichtsbewusstsein? [History and language: Is bilingual history teaching the royal road to historical awareness?] In S. Breidbach, G. Bach, & D. Wolff (Eds.), Bilingualer Sachfachunterricht: Didaktik, Lehrer-/Lernerforschung und Bildungspolitik zwischen Theorie und Empirie. [Bilingual subject teaching: Didactics, teacher/learning research and educational policy between theory and empiricism.] (pp. 191–206). Peter Lang.
Lapadat, J. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462
Lasagabaster, D. (2013). The use of the L1 in CLIL classes: The teachers’ perspective. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 6(2), 1–21. https://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/3148/
Lavina, L., & Lawson, F. (2019). Weaving forgotten pieces of place and the personal: Using collaborative auto-ethnography and aesthetic modes of reflection to explore teacher identity development. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 20(6). http://www.ijea.org/v20n6/
Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL Counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 93–119. http://www.icrj.eu/11/article8.html
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan.
Merino, J. A. & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). CLIL as a way to multilingualism, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1128386
Met, M. (2009). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. NFLC Reports. http://www.carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/principles/decisions.html
Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. D. (2012). Toward a dialogic methodology. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds), Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 9–39). Left Coast Press.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Harvard University Press.
Ohmori, A. (2014). Exploring the potential of CLIL in English language teaching in Japanese Universities: An innovation for the development of effective teaching and global awareness. The Journal of Rikkyo University Language Center, 32, 39–51. https://rikkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=10584&item_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=49
Phan, H. L. (2013). Issues surrounding English, the internationalisation of higher education and national cultural identity in Asia: A focus on Japan. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.781047
Pinner, R. (2012). Unlocking literature through CLIL: Authentic materials and tasks to promote cultural and historical understanding. In S. Izumi, M. Ikeda, & Y. Watanabe. (Eds.), CLIL: Content and language integrated learning: New challenges in foreign language education at Sophia University: Practices and applications (Vol. 2, pp. 91–129). Sophia University Press.
Razfar, A. (2011). Action research in urban schools: Empowerment, transformation, and challenges. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(4), 25–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479629
Rinehart, R. E., & Earl, K. (2016). Auto-, duo-and collaborative-ethnographies: “caring” in an audit culture climate. Qualitative Research Journal, 16(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2016-0024
Roy, R., & Uekusa, S. (2020). Collaborative autoethnography: “Self-reflection” as a timely alternative research approach during the global pandemic. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(4), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-06-2020-0054
Sardabi, N., Mansouri, B., & Behzadpoor, F. (2020). Autoethnography in TESOL. In The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0995
Smiles, T. L., & Short, K. G. (2006). Transforming teacher voice through writing for publication. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 133–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478898
Stigger, E. (2018). Introduction: Internationalization in higher education. In E. Stigger, M. Wang, D. Laurence, & A. Bordilovskaya (Eds.), Internationalization within higher education: Perspectives from Japan (pp. 1–19). Springer.
Stohler, U. (2006). The acquisition of knowledge in bilingual learning: An empirical study of the role of language in content learning. Views, 15(3), 41–46.
Taguchi, N. & Naganuma, N. (2006). Transition from learning English to learning in English: Students’ perceived adjustment difficulties in an English-medium university in Japan. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4), 52–73. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Dec_06_nt&nn.php
Takagi, H. (2013). The internationalization of curricula: The complexity and diversity of meaning in and beyond Japanese universities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.820138
Wilmes, S., Te Heesen, K., Siry, C., Kneip, N., & Heinericy, S. (2018). The role of critical reflexivity in the professional development of professional developers: A co-autoethnographic exploration. Interfaces Científicas, 7(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.17564/2316-3828.2018v7n1p13–24
Yazan, B., Jain, R., & Canagarajah, S. (Eds.). (2020). Autoethnographies in ELT: Transnational identities, pedagogies, and practices. Routledge.

Citation

Adamson, J., Christmas, J., & Tu, L.-H. (2023). Teachers Talking About CLIL Pedagogy: Transforming Teacher Practices Through Collaborative Autoethnography. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13112

Adamson, J., Christmas, J., and Tu, L.-H. (2023). Teachers Talking About CLIL Pedagogy: Transforming Teacher Practices Through Collaborative Autoethnography. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(2), pp. 185-205. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13112

Adamson J, Christmas J, Tu LH. Teachers Talking About CLIL Pedagogy: Transforming Teacher Practices Through Collaborative Autoethnography. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2023;7(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13112

Adamson, John, Julia Christmas, and Li-hsin Tu. "Teachers Talking About CLIL Pedagogy: Transforming Teacher Practices Through Collaborative Autoethnography". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2023 7 no. 2 (2023): 185-205. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13112

Adamson, John et al. "Teachers Talking About CLIL Pedagogy: Transforming Teacher Practices Through Collaborative Autoethnography". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, pp. 185-205. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13112

Adamson J, Christmas J, Tu LH. Teachers Talking About CLIL Pedagogy: Transforming Teacher Practices Through Collaborative Autoethnography. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2023;7(2):185-205. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13112