Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder

Alexios Brailas; Elena Tragou; Konstantinos Papachristopoulos

doi:10.29333/ajqr/13230

Alexios Brailas ¹ ^* , Elena Tragou ², Konstantinos Papachristopoulos ³

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp. 19-31

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230

OPEN ACCESS 4344 Views 6875 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

This article demonstrates the process of coding textual data, using QualCoder, a free and open-source software tool for supporting the qualitative data analysis process. The aim is to introduce novice qualitative researchers and undergraduate students of qualitative methods to the process of open coding in a clear and concise way. The systematic coding of the empirical data is a crucial first step in many popular qualitative methods like Thematic Analysis or Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The initial coding phase is a prerequisite for analyzing and making sense of the data. By using QualCoder, the researcher utilizes a dependable, efficient, and easily accessible tool to work with coding without losing transparency, rigor, and depth in the process. The article concludes by discussing the multiple benefits of using such a tool for the coding process, as well as limitations and potential risks, and thus highlighting the multi-purpose pairing between technology and qualitative research.

Keywords: coding, open-source, QualCoder, thematic analysis.

References

Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2018). What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0011
Akram, M., & Perveen, S. (2021). Book review: The ethical algorithm. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(2), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11389
André, E. (2020). Reflections on qualitative data analysis software: Possibilities, limitations and challenges in qualitative educational research. Revista Electrónica En Educación y Pedagogía, 4(6), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.15658/rev.electron.educ.pedagog20.05040604
Banner, D. J., & Albarran, J. W. (2009). Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software: A review. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(3). 24–31.
Brailas, A. (2014). Networked grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 19(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1270
Brailas, A. (2020). Using drawings in qualitative interviews: An introduction to the practice. The Qualitative Report, 25(12), 4447–4460. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4585
Brailas, A., & Sotiropoulou, C. (2023). Relational, appreciative, and process-oriented digital storytelling: A duoethnography. Human Arenas. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00337-7
Brandão, C., & Costa, A. P. (2020). Reflecting on CAQDAS and ethics. The Qualitative Report, 25(11), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4767
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bringer, J. D., Johnston, L. H., & Brackenridge, C. H. (2006). Using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software to develop a grounded theory project. Field Methods, 18(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X06287602
Carcary, M. (2011). Evidence analysis using CAQDAS: Insights from a qualitative researcher. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(1), 10–24.
Carney, J., Joiner, J., & Tragou, H. (1997). Categorizing, coding, and manipulating qualitative data using the WordPerfect® word processor. The Qualitative Report, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2029
Chandra, Y., & Shang, L. (2017). An RQDA-based constructivist methodology for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2016-0014
Chenail, R. J. (2012a). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Qualitative data analysis as a metaphoric process. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1818
Chenail, R. J. (2012b). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Reading line-by-line, but analyzing by meaningful qualitative units. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1817
Cope, D. G. (2014). Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(3), 322–323. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.322-323
Corr, P. G., & Davidson, L. F. (2023). Conducting grounded theory research in the early days of the Coronavirus pandemic: Process interruptions, barriers, and innovative approaches to study design. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12924
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (2023). Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Curtain, C. (2023). QualCoder 3.2. https://github.com/ccbogel/QualCoder/releases/tag/3.2
DeHart, J. D. (2022). Crafting a visual review of the literature. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12128
Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
Evers, J. (2018). Current issues in Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS): A user and developer perspective. The Qualitative Report, 23(13), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3205
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
FOSTER Consortium. (2018). What is Open Science? https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2629946
Guthrie, K. (2020). Qualitative inquiry with adolescents: Strategies for fostering rich meaning making in group interviews. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8586
Hagger, M. S. (2022). Developing an open science ‘mindset.’ Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 10(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2021.2012474
Hesse, A., Glenna, L., Hinrichs, C., Chiles, R., & Sachs, C. (2019). Qualitative research ethics in the big data era. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(5), 560–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218805806
Issari, P., & Pourkos, M. (2015). Qualitative research methodology: Applications in psychology and education. www.Kallipos.gr. https://repository.kallipos.gr/bitstream/11419/5826/4/15327_Isari-KOY.pdf
Kapiszewski, D., & Karcher, S. (2021). Transparency in practice in qualitative research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000955
Korzybski, A. (1958). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics (5th ed.). Inst. of General Semantics.
Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Gronau, Q. F., Smíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Wild, A., Knight, P., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2019). JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs. Journal of Statistical Software, 88(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i02
Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative researching (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative thematic inquiry: A new method for analyzing qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118
Nathaniel, A. (2022). When and how to use extant literature in classic grounded theory. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12441
Navarro, D. J., & Foxcroft, D. R. (2018). Learning statistics with jamovi: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. https://doi.org/10.24384/HGC3-7P15
Niedbalski, J., & Ślęzak, I. (2022). Encounters with CAQDAS: Advice for beginner users of computer software for qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 27(4), 1114–1132. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.4770
O’Kane, P. (2020). Demystifying CAQDAS: A series of dilemmas. In T. R. Crook, J. Lê, & A. D. Smith (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 133–152). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-838720200000012020
O’Kane, P., Smith, A., & Lerman, M. P. (2021). Building transparency and trustworthiness in inductive research through computer-aided qualitative data analysis software. Organizational Research Methods, 24(1), 104–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119865016
Pratt, M. G., Kaplan, S., & Whittington, R. (2020). Editorial essay: The tumult over transparency: Decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663
Rampin, R., & Rampin, V. (2021). Taguette: Open-source qualitative data analysis. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(68), Article 3522. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03522
Sinkovics, R. R., & Alfoldi, E. A. (2012). Progressive focusing and trustworthiness in qualitative research: The enabling role of Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS). Management International Review, 52(6), 817–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0140-5
Souto-Manning, M. (2014). Critical narrative analysis: The interplay of critical discourse and narrative analyses. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.737046
Stander, J., & Dalla Valle, L. (2017). On enthusing students about big data and social media visualization and analysis using R, RStudio, and RMarkdown. Journal of Statistics Education, 25(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2017.1322474
Thompson, J. (2022). A guide to abductive thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(5), 1410-1421.https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5340
Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. McGraw Hill Education, Open University Press.
Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149
Woods, M., Macklin, R., & Lewis, G. K. (2016). Researcher reflexivity: Exploring the impacts of CAQDAS use. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1023964

Citation

Brailas, A., Tragou, E., & Papachristopoulos, K. (2023). Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230

Brailas, A., Tragou, E., and Papachristopoulos, K. (2023). Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(3), pp. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230

Brailas A, Tragou E, Papachristopoulos K. Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2023;7(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230

Brailas, Alexios, Elena Tragou, and Konstantinos Papachristopoulos. "Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2023 7 no. 3 (2023): 19-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230

Brailas, Alexios et al. "Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 2023, pp. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230

Brailas A, Tragou E, Papachristopoulos K. Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2023;7(3):19-31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230