How Personality Impacts Remote Workers in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study

Christopher Van Ham

doi:10.29333/ajqr/11588

Christopher Van Ham ¹ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 107-122

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11588

OPEN ACCESS 2315 Views 1687 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The present study identifies and discusses the impact of personality factors on remote workers in China, using a phenomenological methodology to understand participants' lived experiences. The sample population is comprised of Chinese citizens born in China. Data were collected through one-on-one, online semi-structured interviews using WeChat. The interview questions are structured to allow participants to explain personality traits found in productive and unproductive remote workers. In addition, the questions explore traits positively associated with developing trust and how the psychological needs of autonomy, competency, and relatedness impact remote workers. After data collection, the data were analyzed and coded to develop themes used to answer the core research questions. This study’s findings offer benefits to companies using remote workers and employees new to remote work or those aiming to become remote workers since the data collected provides a holistic picture of remote work from actual workers' perspective. The information gathered from the research participants allowed the researcher to determine that one of the most beneficial aspects of remote work is autonomy and the ability to set one's schedule. Confidence directly impacts feelings of competency among remote workers, and relatedness is negatively impacted by being a remote worker because of decreased opportunities for face-to-face interactions.

Keywords: China, personality, remote work, self-determination theory, phenomenology

References

Bond, M, H., & Lun, V, M, C., Chan, J., Chan, W, W, Y., & Wong, D. (2012). Enacting modesty in Chinese culture: The joint contribution of personal characteristics and contextual features. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01357.x
Bonello, M., & Meehan, B. (2019). Transparency and coherence in a doctoral study case analysis: Reflecting on the use of NVivo within a 'framework' approach. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3823
CEBR. (2020, December). World Economic League Table 2021 (12th edition). https://cebr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WELT-2021-final-23.12.pdf
Choi, S. (2019). Flexible work arrangements and employee retention: A longitudinal analysis of the federal workforces. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019886340
Chong, A., Gordo, M., & Gere, J. (2018). The influences of work and home interference and facilitation on job satisfaction. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000202
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
de Vos, D., Meijers, E., & van Ham, M. (2018). Working from home and the willingness to accept a longer commute. The Annals of Regional Science, 61(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0873-6
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Gill, M. J. (2020). How can I study who you are? Methodological approaches to identify work research. In A. Brown (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of identities in organizations (pp. 295–310). Oxford University Press.
Giorgi, A. (2017). A response to the attempted critique of the scientific phenomenological method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 48, 83–144. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341319
Gubins, S., Ommeren, J. V., & Graaff, T. D. (2019). Does new information technology change commuting behavior? The Annals of Regional Science, 62(1), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0893-2
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. Plos One, 15(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Hampton, R. S., Kwon, J. Y., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2021). Variations in the regulation of affective neural responses across three cultures. Emotion, 21(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000711
Hu, Z., Lin, X., Kaminga, A. C., & Xu, H. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on lifestyle behaviors and their association with subjective well-being among the general population in mainland China: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.2196/21176
Jukka, M., Blomqvist, K., Li, P. P., & Gan, C. (2017). Trust-distrust balance: Trust ambivalence in Sino-Western B2B relationships. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3), 482– 507. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccsm-01-2016-0019
Kim, M., & Beehr, T., A. (2020). The long reach of the leader: Can empowering leadership at work result in enriched home lives? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(3), 203–213. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000177
Kuem, J., Khansa, L., & Kim, S. S. (2020). Prominence and engagement: Different mechanisms regulating continuance and contribution in online communities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 162–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1705510
Levitt, H. M. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95–110. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000184
Levitt, H. M., Wertz, F. J., Motulsky, S. L., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
Lukenchuk, A. (2017). Working with the data and presenting the findings. Counterpoints, 428, 101–117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40222682
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Pasupathi, M., Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Drustrup, D., Fivush, R., Graci, M. E., Lilgendahl, J. P., Lodi-Smith, J., McAdams, D.P., & Mccoy, T. (2020). The empirical structure of narrative identity: The initial big three. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 119(4), 920–944. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vu4qw
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.
Mulki, J., Bardhi, F., & Lassk, F. G. (2009). Set up remote workers to thrive. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), 63–69.
Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-07-2017-0172
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2021). Main Data of the Seventh National Population Census. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english
Nilles, J. M. (1991). Telecommuting and urban sprawl: Mitigator or inciter? Transportation, 18(4), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186567
Nilles, J. M. (1997). Telework: Enabling distributed organizations. Information Systems Management, 14(4), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580539708907069
Patton, M., Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR: Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.
Potard, C., Henry, A., Boudoukha, A.-H., Courtois, R., Laurent, A., & Lignier, B. (2020). Video game players' personality traits: An exploratory cluster approach to identifying gaming preferences. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(4), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000245
Qi, X. (2011). Face: A Chinese concept in global sociology. Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 279– 295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311407692
Resnik, P. (2017). Metadiscourse in spoken interaction in ESL: A multilingual perspective. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 17(2), 189–210.
Roald, T., Koppe, S., Jensen, T. B., Hansen, J. M., & Levin, K. (2021). Why do we always generalize in qualitative research? Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 69–81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000138
Schatzki, T. (2017). Pas de deux: Practice theory and phenomenology. Phänomenologische Forschungen, 2, 25-40. https://doi.org/10.28937/1000107734
Shi, Y. (2019). Contemporary contexts of Confucianism. Comparative Civilization Review, 80(80), 92–103. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol80/iss80/18/
Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: Application of the framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 52–62.
Smith, S. A., Patmos, A., & Pitts, M. J. (2015). Communication and teleworking: A study of communication channel satisfaction, personality, and job satisfaction for teleworking employees. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415589101
The 14th five-year plan for economic and social development of the People’s Republic of China: 2021–2025. (2021). Central Compilation and Translation Press.
Unanue, W., Gómez, M. E., Cortez, D., Oyanedel, J. C., & MendiburoSeguel, A. (2017). Revisiting the link between job satisfaction and life satisfaction: The role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 680. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00680
Von Bergen, C. W., Bressler, M. S., & Proctor, T. L. (2019) On the grid 24/7/365 and the right to disconnect. Employee Relations Law Journal, 45(2), 3–20.
Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–72.
Wu, Y., & Cheng, Z. (2019). Formation of user stickiness in an online knowledge community in China. Social Behavior and Personality, 47(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8292
Zhang, S., Moeckel, R., Moreno, A. T., Shuai, B., & Gao, J. (2020). A work-life conflict perspective on telework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.007

Citation

Van Ham, C. (2022). How Personality Impacts Remote Workers in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11588

Van Ham, C. (2022). How Personality Impacts Remote Workers in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), pp. 107-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11588

Van Ham C. How Personality Impacts Remote Workers in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(1), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11588

Van Ham, Christopher. "How Personality Impacts Remote Workers in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2022 6 no. 1 (2022): 107-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11588

Van Ham, Christopher "How Personality Impacts Remote Workers in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2022, pp. 107-122. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11588

Van Ham C. How Personality Impacts Remote Workers in Mainland China: A Qualitative Study. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2022;6(1):107-22. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11588