Examining the Retention and Exodus of Women in Technology

Christa Banton; Jose Abelardo Garza; Alfreda Goods; Tiefa Jones; Lisa Langford

doi:10.29333/ajqr/15215

Christa Banton ¹ ^* , Jose Abelardo Garza ² ^* , Alfreda Goods ³ ^* , Tiefa Jones ³ ^* , Lisa Langford ³ ^*

More Detail

AM J QUALITATIVE RES, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp. 132-150

https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15215

OPEN ACCESS 341 Views 157 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

When looking at workplace dynamics, especially given the pandemic, we must identify why individuals choose to leave specific fields, such as STEM, specifically computer science. The purpose of this study was to identify the unique belonging experiences of women who specifically work in the technology field. Issues such as the need for belonging, marginalization, workplace culture, imposter syndrome, and allyship affect how women feel connected to their work. Using a qualitative narrative inquiry approach, nine women were interviewed for their unique perspective of belonging in the technological workspace. Within the transcriptions, certain themes were derived from the data, which included (1) lack of belonging in the workspace, (2) lack of trust, and (3) lack of support. However, we also discovered that women can be successful leaders in the technology sector if they receive support from a mentor at work. For the computer science industry to attract and retain female talent, addressing these obstacles and fostering a more inclusive environment is imperative to counter underrepresentation.

Keywords: Belonging, diversity, STEM fields, technology, women, workspace

References

Allen, K.A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInerney, D. M., & Slavich, G. G. (2021). Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87–102 https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409
Arif, S., Afolabi, T., Mitrzyk, B. M., Thomas, T. F., Borja-Hart, N., Wade, L., & Henson, B. (2022). Engaging in authentic allyship as part of our professional development. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(5), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8690
Babla, K., Lau, S., Akindolie, O., Radia, T., Kingdon, C., Bush, A., & Gupta, A. (2022). Allyship: An incremental approach to addressing microaggressions in medicine. Paediatrics & Child Health, 32(7), 273–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2022.04.006
Baum, B. (2021). Diversity, equity, and inclusion: Are organizations truly committed to a workplace culture shift? Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 33(2), 11–23.
Baumeister, R. F., Brewer, L. E., Tice, D.M., & Twenge, J. M. (2007). Thwarting the need to belong: Understanding the interpersonal and inner effects of social exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 506–520. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02386
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin,117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Bruce, A., Beuthin, R., Sheilds, L., Molzahn, A., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2016). Narrative research evolving: Evolving through narrative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916659292
Canlas, A. L., & Williams, M. R. (2022). Meeting belongingness needs: An inclusive leadership practitioner’s approach. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 24(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223221118953
Chamberlain, L. J., & Hodson, R. (2010). Toxic work environments: What helps and what hurts. Sociological Perspectives, 53(4), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.455
Chambliss, D. F., & Schutt, R. K. (2019). Making sense of the social world: Methods of investigation (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Channa, L. (2016). Narrative inquiry: A research tradition in qualitative research. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 18(1), 1–18.
Chen, Y. (2023). More women at work: Historical perspectives. https://www.calvert.com/media/public/42018.pdf
Choudhary, A. I., Akhtar, S. A., & Zaheer, A. (2013). Impact of transformational and servant leadership on organizational performance: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1470-8
Conner, B., McCauliff, K., Shue, C., & Stamp, G. H. (2018). Explaining mansplaining. Women & Language, 41(2), 143–167.
Davidson, J. (2017, December 4). Mostly white male tech sector needs government help on diversity. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/12/04/tech-sector-needs-uncle-sams-help-on-diversity/
Dharejo, S., Hussain, N., Muhammad Farooq, S., Shafique Kalwar, M., & Raza Mallah, W. (2021). Examining the effect of authoritative and laissez-faire leadership on employee involvement and performance. International Journal Advanced Research Engineering a Technology, 12(2), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.12.2.2021.053
Dickerson, S. R. (2021, January 28). What is allyship? National Institutes of Health. Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. https://www.edi.nih.gov/blogcommunities/whatallyship.
Freedman, G., Green, M. C., Kussman, M., Drusano, M., & Moore, M. M. (2023). Dear future women of STEM: Letters of advice from women in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00411-0
Gates, T. G., Achia, T., & Petch, J. (2021). Allyship, social justice values, and commitment at an Australian social service organization. Journal of Social Service Research, 47(6), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2021.1924341
Gichuru, M. J. (2017). The interpretative research paradigm: A critical review of its research methodologies. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 4(2), 1–5. Global Diplomatic Forum. (2023, July). Breaking down barriers: Paving the way for women in tech and leadership. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/breaking-down-barriers-paving-way-women-tech-leadership/
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. Paulist Press.
Guevara-Ramírez, P., Ruiz-Pozo, V. A., Cadena-Ullauri, S., Salazar-Navas, G., Bedón, A. A., V-Vázquez, J. F., & Zambrano, A. K. (2022). Ten simple rules for empowering women in STEM. PLoS Computer Biology, 18(12), Article e1010731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010731
Hall, J. M., Stevens, P. E., & Meleis, A. I. (1994). Marginalization. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(4), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199406000-00005
Hays-Thomas, R. (2022). Diversity, equity, and inclusion in organizations. In Managing workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808884-2
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Holt, K. S. (2024). How can DEI training change the culture of an organization to achieve belonging and retain diverse employees? [Master’s thesis, Portland State University]. https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/42469
Hughes, R., Nzekwe, B., & Molyneaux, K. (2013). The single sex debate for girls in science: A comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1979–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7
Jiang, X. (2010). How to motivate people working in teams. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n10p223
Kolontari, F., Lawton, M., & Rhodes, S. (2023). Using developmental mentoring and coaching approaches in academic and professional development to address feelings of “imposter syndrome.” Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 11(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v11i1.537
Kumar, S., & Jagacinski, C. M. (2006). Imposters have goals too: The imposter phenomenon and its relationship to achievement goal theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.014
Kurtz, J. A. (2003). Mothers of invention: Women in technology. Indiana Business Review, 78(3), 1–9. https://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/ibr/2003/fall03/fall03_art1.html
Langford, L. K., Jones, D. T. S., & Goods, A. (2023). Developing a sense of belonging for African American women in the workplace [White Paper]. University of Phoenix. https://www.phoenix.edu/content/dam/edu/media-center/doc/whitepapers/developing-sense-of-belonging-african-american-women-workplace.pdf
Lemons, M. A., & Parzonger, M. J. (2001). Designing women: A qualitative study of the glass ceiling for women in technology. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 66(2), 4–11.
Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Finkelstien, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4), 420–436.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Matsuo, M. (2023). Being authentic by sharing team vision: mediating role of strengths use within a team. Personnel Review, 52(5), 1548–1562. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2021-0420
McCoy, Z. (2021). Workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion programs: Inclusive environments and diversity promotion programs. University of San Francisco Law Review, 55(2), 153–178.
Moser, C. E., & Branscombe, N. R. (2022). Communicating inclusion: How men and women perceive interpersonal versus organizational gender equality messages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221140300
Pino Gavidia, L. A., & Adu, J. (2022). Critical narrative inquiry: An examination of a methodological approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221081594
Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. Internal Journal STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40594-018-0115-6
Sabat, I. Nault, E., Saab Fortney, S., Peterson, M. B., & Banerjee, D. (2023). Diversity, inclusion, and equity in the engineering curriculum: Evaluating the efficacy of a new teaching module. Advances in Engineering Education, 11(3), 54–76. https://doi/org/10.18260/3-1-1153-36048
Savin-Baden, M., & Van Niekerk, L. V. (2007). Narrative inquiry: Theory and practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601071324
Tagliaro, C., Migliore, A., Mosca, E. I., & Capolongo, S. (2024). Room for diversity: A review of research and industry approaches to inclusive workplaces. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 26(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-04-2023-0017
Taparia, M., & Lenka, U. (2022). An integrated conceptual framework of the glass ceiling effect. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9(3), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2020-0098
van Bommel, H. M., Hubers, F., & Maas, K. E. H. (2024). Prominent themes and blind spots in diversity and inclusion literature: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(3), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05522-w
Wang, K. T., Sheveleva, M. S., & Permykova, T. M. (2019). Imposter syndrome among Russian students: The link between perfectionism and psychological distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.005
Williams, J. C., Korn, R. M., & Ghani, A. (2022, April). Pinning down the jellyfish: The workplace experiences of women of color in tech. University of California, Hastings College of Law.
Williams, J. C., Phillips, K. W., & Hall, E. V. (2014). Gender bias against women in science. University of California, Hastings College of Law.
Wilson, D., & VanAntwerp. J. (2021). Left out: A review of women’s struggle to develop a sense of belonging in engineering. Sage Open, 11(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040791
Xu, C., & Lastrapes, R. E. (2022). Impact of STEM sense of belonging on career interest: The role of STEM attitudes. Journal of Career Development, 49(6), 1215–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/089485321|1033025"https://doi.org/10.1177/089485321|1033025

Citation

Banton, C., Garza, J. A., Goods, A., Jones, T., & Langford, L. (2024). Examining the Retention and Exodus of Women in Technology. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(4), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15215

Banton, C., Garza, J. A., Goods, A., Jones, T., and Langford, L. (2024). Examining the Retention and Exodus of Women in Technology. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(4), pp. 132-150. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15215

Banton C, Garza JA, Goods A, Jones T, Langford L. Examining the Retention and Exodus of Women in Technology. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2024;8(4), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15215

Banton, Christa, Jose Abelardo Garza, Alfreda Goods, Tiefa Jones, and Lisa Langford. "Examining the Retention and Exodus of Women in Technology". American Journal of Qualitative Research 2024 8 no. 4 (2024): 132-150. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15215

Banton, Christa et al. "Examining the Retention and Exodus of Women in Technology". American Journal of Qualitative Research, vol. 8, no. 4, 2024, pp. 132-150. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15215

Banton C, Garza JA, Goods A, Jones T, Langford L. Examining the Retention and Exodus of Women in Technology. AM J QUALITATIVE RES. 2024;8(4):132-50. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/15215